Evaluation Process

Academic studies submitted for the “The Journal of Scientific Mysticism and Literature” are primarily pre-evaluated by the editorial board in compliance with the journal’s focus and scope. The suitable studies are transferred to the field editor and sent to the double referee to be determined according to the field for evaluation. The double-blind peer review application is valid, and the referee cannot see the information of the academic study owners. Reviewers are given 45 days to complete their review for formality and originality.

As a result of the reports from the referees,

1. Accepting the application (no editing needed),
2. Minor editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the minor corrections specified),
3. Major editing required (Author will be accepted if they make the essential corrections indicated),
4. Reject application (if the writing is substandard)

It must specify one of its options. In case of an “accept the application” or a “reject the application” evaluation from the

referees: The article is sent to a third referee to be examined for formality and originality.

Then, all evaluations on the subject are sent to the author. A stylistic change may be requested if the language or writing style

is substandard. The editorial board makes the final decision regarding the publication of the studies.

Authors are advised to download and review all evaluation forms (form and content pre-evaluation, field editor, and referee forms) used by the journal to guide them while writing their article proposals.